US and China Put $60 Billion of Trade on a Tariff-Relief Track

— But Importers Still Pay Existing Rates

Washington and Beijing have published the first concrete product lists under their new trade framework, covering roughly $30 billion of goods in each direction. The significance is real, but the headline should not be mistaken for an immediate tariff cut: customs treatment has not yet changed.

The United States and China have moved their latest trade agreement from broad political commitments to a more specific product-level framework, identifying goods worth approximately $30 billion in each direction for potentially more favourable tariff treatment.

The development was confirmed on September 27–28 following President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping's Washington summit and the latest round of economic and trade consultations. The U.S. Trade Representative said the two countries had recommended more favourable treatment for $30 billion of non-sensitive goods on each side under the new U.S.-China Board of Trade. China subsequently confirmed the reciprocal tariff-reduction arrangement and said the measures would be implemented simultaneously after the necessary domestic legal procedures.

The distinction between "identified for tariff relief" and "tariff relief now in force" is critical for anyone actually moving goods.

The lists are now much more specific

The U.S. side has identified categories of Chinese imports including toys, small household appliances, holiday decorations, children's products and other household goods for potentially more favourable treatment.

China's list is considerably broader in the number of product categories. It includes agricultural products, meat, dairy, grains, fish and seafood, timber and wood products, cosmetics, medical devices and coal, among others.

China's Ministry of Commerce says the reciprocal arrangement covers approximately $30 billion of imports from each country and that around 90% of the products covered would receive tariff treatment at Most-Favoured-Nation rates. The two governments will implement the reductions simultaneously once their respective domestic procedures have been completed.

That is a significant change from the earlier stages of the negotiation. In September, the two sides were still describing the arrangement as a framework under discussion. China's Commerce Ministry said on September 17 that the teams were maintaining close communication and that details would be released later.

Those details have now started to appear.

But the new tariffs are not yet operative.

The U.S. Trade Representative described the product treatment as recommendations for more favourable tariff treatment, rather than publishing an immediately effective tariff schedule. The White House documents similarly say the two countries will consider the listed products for reduced tariff treatment in accordance with their domestic laws and procedures.

For importers, that means the customs declaration does not change simply because a product appears on the list.

What changes for companies moving goods?

The immediate impact is therefore less about today's duty bill and more about planning certainty.

A U.S. importer buying a Chinese product that appears on the U.S. list cannot simply assume that the lower rate applies to its next entry. Until the relevant U.S. implementing measures are published, the existing tariff treatment remains the basis for customs clearance.

The same principle applies to U.S. exporters selling into China.

That distinction matters particularly for companies negotiating purchase prices, deciding where to source components, calculating landed costs or comparing Chinese suppliers with alternative origins.

A tariff reduction that has been announced politically but not implemented legally is not yet a saving.

For procurement departments, the sensible approach is therefore to model two positions:

  • the tariff treatment currently applicable;

  • the potential treatment once the new arrangement is legally implemented.

Contracts and quotations should not be built around the second number until the customs authorities have actually published the applicable measures.

Agriculture is one of the clearest operational effects

The Chinese list gives particular importance to U.S. agricultural exports.

The products identified include grains, meat, dairy, fish and seafood, vegetable oils and other agricultural commodities. Reuters reported on September 28 that China's list includes a broad range of agricultural products, although U.S. soybeans remain subject to an additional 10% tariff and were excluded from the new reduction list.

That exclusion is commercially important because soybeans are one of the largest individual agricultural trade flows between the two countries.

Chinese state-owned buyers Sinograin and COFCO have already purchased more than 12 million tonnes of U.S. soybeans, according to Reuters, while the White House has said China committed to buying 25 million tonnes annually through 2028. Beijing has not independently confirmed that specific purchase target.

The new arrangement therefore does not represent a blanket return to unrestricted agricultural trade. It creates a more selective tariff environment in which individual commodities can have very different treatment.

That is precisely why importers and exporters need to work at HS-code level, rather than treating the agreement as a general reduction in China-U.S. tariffs.

The coal commitment could create a separate freight flow

The White House has also said that China will import at least 10 million metric tonnes of U.S. coal in 2027 and another 10 million tonnes in 2028.

That commitment comes with an important qualification: it is contained in the U.S. account of the agreement and was not included in China's own published summary in the same form.

Nevertheless, if implemented at the stated volumes, it would represent a meaningful additional bulk trade flow between the two countries and potentially affect vessel demand, export terminal utilisation and trans-Pacific dry-bulk logistics.

China has said that tariffs on U.S. coal will be included within the reciprocal $30 billion tariff-reduction framework, which it says will facilitate U.S. coal imports in 2027 and 2028.

The operational details — including actual purchase schedules, origins, loading ports and receiving terminals — will be more important to freight markets than the headline commitment itself.

The broader trade truce has also been extended

The tariff lists are being introduced against a wider backdrop of temporary stability.

The existing U.S.-China trade truce has been extended until January 10, 2027, giving both sides additional time to assess implementation and continue negotiations. China described the extension as creating a relatively stable and predictable policy environment for businesses.

That does not amount to a permanent trade settlement.

It creates another defined period during which companies can plan without immediately facing a return to a much more aggressive tariff confrontation.

For supply-chain managers, that distinction is important. The current development reduces near-term policy uncertainty, but it does not eliminate tariff risk.

The January 10 deadline should therefore be treated as another decision point in procurement and sourcing plans, rather than as evidence that the underlying dispute has been resolved.

What this means for shippers and trade professionals

1. Do not change customs calculations yet.
A product appearing on the new list does not automatically mean its tariff has been reduced. Wait for the implementing measures and effective dates.

2. Review affected HS codes now.
Companies importing or exporting products within the listed categories should identify the relevant tariff classifications and quantify the potential difference between today's landed cost and the prospective treatment.

3. Do not assume all China-U.S. trade is becoming cheaper.
The arrangement is selective. Products outside the lists remain subject to their existing treatment, while individual commodities such as soybeans may remain subject to additional duties.

4. Review sourcing decisions before making permanent changes.
The new framework may improve the economics of some China-U.S. flows, but the temporary nature of the wider truce means that tariff exposure has not disappeared.

5. Watch implementation, not announcements.
The commercially meaningful dates will be the publication of the implementing tariff measures, the effective dates and the customs codes covered — not the date of the political announcement.

What to watch next

The next stage is therefore administrative rather than diplomatic.

The key questions are which tariff lines will actually receive preferential treatment, what rates will apply, when will they take effect, and what exclusions or conditions will accompany them?

The newly established U.S.-China Board of Trade is also expected to become the mechanism for continuing work on bilateral trade issues. China and the United States have agreed to establish an agricultural working group, while further discussions will cover investment, financial services and other areas of the relationship.

For freight and supply-chain professionals, the most important development is therefore not that tariffs have suddenly fallen.

It is that Washington and Beijing have now moved from discussing a possible tariff framework to identifying specific trade flows that could receive different treatment.

That creates something companies can finally work with — but until customs authorities turn those recommendations into effective tariff measures, it remains a planning variable rather than a change to the landed cost.

Source note

U.S. Trade Representative — statement on the U.S.-China Board of Trade recommendations, September 27, 2026. USTR statement on the Board of Trade recommendations

Reuters — China and U.S. agree on tariff reductions covering $30 billion of goods in each direction, September 28, 2026. Reuters report on the China-U.S. tariff arrangement

China Ministry of Commerce / Xinhua — China-U.S. reciprocal tariff-reduction framework and consultation process. China Ministry of Commerce